The Existence Of God Essay -- Religion, Theology, Philosophy, logic

The world of God has long been a topic of debate. It is the ultimate topic of discussion, as everyone seems to micturate an opinion on it. I will look at the traditional arguments for the existence of God, the ones that have stood the test of time, and find out how convincing the arguments re totallyy are by looking at each one in turn, analysing the logic behind each argument, and finally looking at its criticisms and the responses to the criticisms.The first argument for the existence of God I will look at is the cosmological argument, more comm only known as the First Cause argument. It is attributed to Saint Thomas Aquinas, a 13th century philosopher. The basic premise is that for the Universe to exist, nearthing must have caused it to exist in the beginning. The conclusion to this premise, argues Saint Thomas, is that God created the Universe, as he is the only thing eternal. The unstated premises in this argument are that an eternal entity is required to create the universe , and that God is the only thing eternal. The history of time in the universe is often likened to a stack of dominoes falling on one other and causing a chain reaction down the path of dominoes. They did not start falling by themselves, as something must have triggered the very first one. In the First Cause argument, it is God that created the Universe and and then was the first cause. This argument even allows for the Big Bang theory, stating that God caused the Big Bang. This is a popular argument because it allows religion and science to co-exist in one theory. In fact, the Big Bang theory helps the First Cause argument because it shows that the Universe did in fact begin at a point in time, essence that there must have been a first cause.Bertrand Rus... ...of these planets. However, this does not explain the apparent convenience of Universes natural laws for organic life. This can be explained in another theory, which states that there are multiple Universes, a multiverse, and that we are simply in the Universe whose natural laws support life.Out of all the arguments and criticisms I have looked at, no(prenominal) have been proven in such a way that any of them are self-evident, and none show truly sound arguments. Some arguments are valid, and some have true (by induction, mainly) premises, but none can be shown to prove the existence of God without doubt using logic.These arguments should not be used as proofs of the existence of non-existence of God, they could simply be used to support a persons particular opinion. However, they should be used carefully as fallacies are committed in all of them.